• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Company Name

(404) 793-9834

  • Home
  • About
    • Bio of Garrett MacKenzie
    • References
  • Courses
    • Processing 1/ Intro to Scientific Molding Outline
    • Mold Set-Up Training
    • Blow Molding
    • Maintenance
    • Scientific Molding
  • Webinars
  • 2020 Schedule
  • Our Mission
  • Contact
  • Plastic Injection Test
  • Articles
  • YOUR equipment YOUR materials, YOUR molds, YOUR processes. AT-YOUR-PRESS training!
    Best place to learn plastic injection?
    ON THE FLOOR ..NOT IN A CLASSROOM!
You are here: Home / Plastic Injection Process Adjustments

Plastic Injection Process Adjustments

Processing in plastic injection can sometimes be a tricky business. It takes a strong and knowledgeable approach towards process set up when adjustments are being made to a process. Materials respond in different ways to process change, and every adjustment made needs to be accomplished with a solid understanding that a part’s dimensional, aesthetic and even function can either be improved or degraded as variables are changed.

A good comparison to process adjustment in regards to machine response is the older style radio with a knob designed for both broad and fine tuning. The larger knob can be adjusted for aggressively adjusting frequencies to get to the station you want. The smaller knob allows for fine tuning of a particular station.

Process adjustment is very similar. There are adjustments that can be made for fast and/ or broad change(s) while establishing process, and other changes that work better when making small adjustments to an established process. It is crucial to note that the time to be making major changes to a specific process is during the engineering phase of process development and validation.

This article will outline various process changes a processor has available to him when a process requires change. It will outline specific parameter changes, their potential outcomes.. as well as specific problems to look for. It will also provide insight on how long it takes for specific changes to take effect .

Barrel Temperature: Barrel temperature would be an adjustment that can be either a broad or fine adjustment to process. It is important to remember that the best way to gauge the end result of a temperature change is measuring melt temperatures. Melt temperature variation can result in a deterioration of the overall result even with a modest adjustment. Great care should be taken to verify part function, aesthetics and dimensions. Some instances that may require barrel temperature change might be when viscosity is a suspect in defects occurring, or if process optimization is being attempted.

One important consideration to note is that these types of changes require time to allow the change to take affect. The best approach to verifying the result of temperature modifications is monitoring the change itself . If a temperature is raised or lowered, allow the temperature to first rise or drop or rise to the set point. You must then allow 20 minutes for the barrel to heat soak or cool to see if the change was successful. Large temperature changes are best approached with the press idle. This prevents running scrap as the press runs due to the length of time required for heat changes to take affect with a press in running condition. It is important to note that when a press is in a running condition, it could take several hours for a large change to be confirmed as the actual molding condition.

Mold Temperature: Much like barrel temperature, mold temperature also serves a dual purpose as both a broad or small change to an ongoing process. Much like the barrel, changes can not be ruled as good or bad without first allowing the mold to heat soak or cool for a minimum of 20 minutes after the set point has been reached.

The mold responds similarly to barrel temperature changes in that it could take a couple of hours for the mold to settle into the actual running state condition when large changes are made. Small changes can generally be confirmed 20 minutes after the set point has been reached. It should also be noted that mold temperature changes should be avoided until at least 20 minutes after start up to be sure that both the barrel and mold have reached a heat soaked state.

Back Pressure: Making changes to back pressure are generally a broad adjustment, resulting in larger changes to barrel temperature. It is important to remember that while increasing back pressure raises barrel temperature and lowers viscosity, it also breaks down the material more aggressively, which results in shorter chains. This can adversely affect part strength. Making large changes to back pressure during production can take several hours for the barrel to soak or cool to a consistent result.

Cut-Off (Transfer): Changes to cut-off would be used for fine tuning a process, and are achieved quickly. After making the change, the result can generally be viewed by verifying that cut-off position was made on the next cycle. Large changes to cut-off should only be made with hold/ and pack pressure removed to prevent tool damage. Hold and pack are added back into the process in increment following verification that the part fills out to 95-98 % of total fill. The part should have a small short, or sinky appearance prior to adding pressure. Cool Time: Cool time can be either a broad or fine tuned change. Cool time effects can be verified 20 minutes after the change has been made, but larger changes may require more time for the overall result to take effect. Take note that longer cool times adversely effect cycle time.

Screw Speed: Screw speed is a change that is used while fine tuning the cycle time of a process. The general rule of thumb is that the screw rotate time should be 1 1/2 to two seconds faster than the actual cool time setpoint. It is also important to remember that changes to back pressure can result in longer or shorter screw rotate times. Screw rotate time should be veruified every time a change is made to back pressure. A screw that recovers too quickly can result in splay defects. Too long a recovery will affect the overal cycle time.

Mold & Ejection Speeds: Mold and ejection speeds are best made with the press out of production to prevent mold damage. Changes made should be reviewed critically while cycling the clamp manually. Slower speeds will affect overall cycle.

In closing, both broad or fine tuned changes that are made are critical to process validity, and any change that is made requires that great care be taken to prevent from straying from the overall verified process. Any time a change is made, parts should be viewed as suspect, and proper precautions should be taken to verify that parts meet quality standards.

Change results should never slow the overall cycle time, unless defect conditions exist that can only be corrected by lengthening the cycle time. Always remember that a single change can result in multiple outcomes, such as a temperature change resulting in burns and/ or warping or a pressure change resulting in flash or sticking parts. Be sure that all personnel that are handling or inspecting the parts are aware that changes have been made, and identify potential hazards to them so they know what to look for. When process changes reach the desired effect, monitor the process for a full shift prior to changing set up data.

As a scientific molder it is important to review all process monitoring data to verify that any changes that exist are documented to assure process validation has been accomplished. Our goal as processors is to eventually reach our constant goal of zero rejects, 100% efficiency and repeatable success during start up and production. Repetitive manufacturing results in business success through process standardization and consistency

Want more information?

Plastic Injection Training

OR, contact me at:

email: garrett@plastic411.com

Phone: 404-793-9834

(404) 793-9834
Garrett MacKenzie
training@plastic411.com

Rodney Davenport CH3 Solutions

Garrett’s class is information-packed for a great price! I would highly recommend..

Rodney Davenport
CH3 Solutions

Dale B. – JSW

Excellent class! Just what I was looking for..

Dale B.
Japanese Steel Works

Chris S., MMI Engineered Solutions

“Great on-the-floor training! Much more beneficial than ‘class room’ training… I would highly recommend.”

Chris S.
MMI Engineered Solutions

Timothy M., North Georgia Molding

“Class was timed well, and the processor training was a success! Instructor was thorough and ‘easily understood’.”

Timothy M.
North Georgia Molding

Darryl B., MMI Engineered Solutions

“Instructor was very knowledgeable, and the hands-on training was very helpful”

Darryl B.
MMI Engineered Solutions

Micheal H., CH3 Solutions

“Instructor was very thorough in the delivery of his training. I would very much recommend!”

Micheal H.
CH3 Solutions

Samuel S, CH3 Solutions

“The hands-on portions were great! The pre-stage training is helpful in set ups”

Samuel S
CH3 Solutions

Kristen R., MMI Engineered Solutions

“I would love to have you come back to do more training!”

Kristen R.
MMI Engineered Solutions

John A. , CH3 Solutions

“Garrett was very knowledgeable, and helpful with questions…”

John A.
CH3 Solutions

Clare Goldsberry

“Garrett is a go-getter with lots of good ideas that he’s bringing to the plastics industry. His experience and expertise is providing him with the know-how to bring technology information to those in the industry with a “need to know”

Clare Goldsberry
Senior Editor: Plastics News/ Plastics Today

Mike Tolinski

“Garrett’s website is a great training-focused online resource of the type the industry needs, especially at a time when it’s becoming harder to find trained plastics technicians”

Mike Tolinski
Editor: Plastics Engineering magazine

Matt Defosse

“Garrett is an expert in multiple facets of plastics processing, and kindly offered to share his expertise in a series of articles for our audience. The mission of our web portal, PlasticsToday.com, is to provide plastics processors with information they can use to run their companies more efficiently. With Garrett’s expert insight, I am sure
…
we can meet that mission.”

Read more “Matt Defosse”

Matt Defosse
Editor: Plastics Today magazine

Norbert Sparrow

“Garrett is the type of individual editors of business-to-business media are always looking for but rarely find: Someone with deep technical expertise who is able to write about a complex topic in a clear and engaging manner. He is a regular contributor to PlasticsToday and I always look forward to receiving his articles because I
…
know that I will learn something new about plastics processing and that minimal editing will be required. His articles also are highly valued by our readers: They consistently receive blockbuster page views.”

Read more “Norbert Sparrow”

Norbert Sparrow
Editor-In-Chief, Plastics Today Magazine

John Bozzelli

“Garrett and I go back to 1997 where he was trained in Scientific Molding procedures. Smart and talented, he has used this methodology and strategy to widen his knowledge base and grow in capabilities. His initiative is shown in starting up plastic411.com and his work at KI “Green Initiatives”. Currently we are working together to
…
incorporate plastics in green technologies.”

Read more “John Bozzelli”

John Bozzelli
Scientific Molding Founder/ Consultant

© 2015-2023, All rights reserved

Site by Industrial Webworks

MENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Bio of Garrett MacKenzie
    • References
  • Courses
    • Processing 1/ Intro to Scientific Molding Outline
    • Mold Set-Up Training
    • Blow Molding
    • Maintenance
    • Scientific Molding
  • Webinars
  • 2020 Schedule
  • Our Mission
  • Contact
  • Plastic Injection Test
  • Articles